How can we define authorship in TV Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

How can we define authorship in TV - subsidisation ExampleGiven this argument, it follows that the identification of the technical competence of the director would enable critic and viewers equivalent to determine the quality and artistic value of the TV program.Auteurism however has been criticized in its application to exact and TV show making because the creation of a picture or show involves a lot of mountain in its production process that it would be difficult to say that a certain individual was just responsible of the authorship or creation of the film (Moran 1999). Moreso, in a Hollywood setting where a multitude of people had to work and collaborate together to create a film. We can cite for character the film The Big Sleep (1946) which was a product of collaboration with different film makers. It involved bracingist Raymond Chandler who wrote the novel which was the basis of the film, Howard Hawks, screenwriters William Faulkner, Leigh Brackett and actors Humphrey B ogart and Lauren Bacall (Lev 1988) all were distinguished artists in their own right. It is also important to note that the film make a last minute revision in January of 1946 invites discussion about authorship because it clarifies when and who decides for the change of the film indicating ownership of the film (Lev 1988). This is an important notion of auteurism because it highlights the complicity in according authorship in a film as argued by the critics of auteurism.In contemporary setting in creating a TV program various originative people are involved to complete the production. It involves Director,Producer,Creator,Executive producer,Assistant producer,Researcher,Star,Writer, all of which have creative inputs to complete the production of a TV program. Such, if we are to determine authorship in the strict heart and soul of the word, it would be difficult to assign it to a single individual because no individual can complete a TV program by himself. We can however infer t o the