Describe elements of power and quote work from Weber, Bachrach & Essay

Describe elements of cause and name work from weber, Bachrach & Baratz & Lukes - Essay ExamplePower and break argon two concepts highly analysed by theorists and researchers. The whole caboodle that are most known in this field are those of weber, Bachrach & Baratz and Lukes. Their views on index finger and control demand certain similarities still, differences exist at the level that each one of these theorists uses different criteria for evaluating human behaviour. In whatsoever case, it has been proved that the kind between strength and control is strong at such level that each of these concepts cannot be fully explained without referring to the other. However, there are also cases where the above concepts can be independent, but these cases are rather the exception and not the rule. In order to understand the relationship between causation and control, it would be necessary to check the elements of these two concepts, as explained by theorists who studied the particular subject. The view of Weber of power is quite important for understanding the relationship between power and control. In accordance with Goverde et al. ... The above rendering of power has been derived by the view of Weber on the specific concept, meaning that the elements of power, as perceived by Weber, could be slightly differentiated from the description given above. In other words, the interpretation of the view of Weber of power cannot be considered as standardized, reflecting the personal view of the theorist who has tried to explain the concept of power using the work of Weber. The definition of power, as given by Weber, is the following one power is the possibility of imposing ones will upon the behaviour of other persons (Weber 1954, p.323 in Vahabi, 2004, p.2). The approaches used by Weber for interpreting power are analysed in the study of Breiner (1996). The above study helps to understand also the relationship between power and control, as perceived by Weber. Breiner (1996) notes that the view of Weber on power seems to cast off the following form power is considered as an advantage of political authorities in other words, power is not so much a right of all individuals, but primarily, a right of regulators to learn on critical issues of their state. From this point of view, power is depended on control in the following way the control on the social/ political and economic affairs of a particular state reflects the power of its governor to rule (Breiner 1996(. In other words, control is a means of governors or politicians in order to channelise their power to govern. This power is related not just to various political issues, but it can be expanded on all aspects of citizens daily life, including culture, sciences and business activity. In accordance with Vahabi (2004) the above description of power is quite effective, reflecting the characteristics of power when being