Employee Involvement Case Essay

For the plate 1 the sugar substitute research finis, I will choose spicy involvement, which is let the subordinates to discuss the problems and identify a solution. So the entire conclusion-making process is handed over to employees, identify the problems, choose the best alternative and implement their choice. For the second case coast guard stonecutter decision problem, I will choose the woeful involvement, which is ask one or to a greater extent subordinates foe information relating to the problem, but you dont ask for their recommendations and might not mention the problem to them. So they dont be recommendations and only participation involves is asking employees for information.Discussion Question 2The first factor conduct me to choose high involvement is the decision structure this problem is not programmed decision but a little insect bite complexity and more opportunity. This product need to take some source away from other projects in order to selectd some time an d resources sooner it would be commercially stage. Second, source of decision knowledge could show that the leader lack sufficient knowledge and subordinates have addition information to improve decision quality. I dont know much about demand is expected and the sugar substitute project beyond my technical expertise. However, the R&D lab researchers argon familiar with that field of chemistry. Third, the decision commitment is trended to improve if high level of involvement to her decision. If the employees are unlikely to accept a decision made without their involvement, some level of involvement should be used. For this case, the company R&D budget is limited and other scientist in my group has recently complained that they require more resources and financial support to get their projects completed. So the employees complaints make me chose high involvement.Also, the employees committed make me believe that they have promise to ensure the companys interest are achieved so that I should give them more involvement to ensure the project could be finished without battle. For the second case, the first factor led me to choose wretched involvement is that this is likely programmd decisions which are followstandard operating procedures and they have been resolved in past. So there is little postulate for high involvement that whitethorn waste of time under this necessary and risk situation. Second, the leader has much knowledge to solve this problem which may pass away in the past, and as the captain, I totally understand the mission and the goal for the mission. So that may need less recommendation from other employees who lack of experiences and abilities.However, the low involvement not no involvement, so I received an update weather advisory concerning the severity and duration of the storm, which is important to making decision. Moreover, the decision essential be made shortly by facing a lot of risks. So if take long time to make high involvement may lead to unnecessary dangers. Third, the factor of risk of conflict is depend on the situation between the employee goals and norms conflict with the organizations goals, and this would be take low involvement. Also, if there is low conflict that the employees will reach agreement on the preferred solution, then take low involvement. For this case, my crew members are extremely careful about their responsibility, so I dont need to take additional time to take high involvement under this low conflict with the preferred solutions.Discussion Question 3To the first case, if take low involvement may take longer time to solve this problem delinquent to the fact that the leader has less knowledge about this technology of projects. Less involvement will not help to improve the number and quality of solutions generated. This case is complex so that need to prepare several alternatives with more available information which the employees who has more knowledge are good to support. Also, with the diverse perspectives and boarder original of value may help to improve the likelihood of choosing the best alter nativities. Besides, these projects are group work in this organization, providing more involvement is good to make staff fell personally responsible for its success. However, the low involvement may lead to lower turnover, motivation and satisfaction.Moreover, if the leader uses low involvement, there is many more compliant and most likely to resist changes resulting from the decision by leader alone. To the second case, the higher involvement was taken, the higher risk could occur during the decision making. The source is that the research hasbeen doing for 20 hours and the weather are more likely to affect the lives in the vessel. So taking time longer to do involvement are defiantly dangers. Also, the captain must be the one who has valuable experiences and ability to make the most perfect decision. So taking long time to doing high involvement could make the wh ole team lost of control.After all, everybody has different attitude and value that may have conflicts with the mission and the whole organization when they stage the risk situation. Furthermore, too low involvement or no involvement may also make wrong decision, so the necessary information from weather advisory concerning are useful for helping the captain decrease the mistake when making the decision in the short time.